Posts Tagged ‘Google’



Aaron

12/12/2011

Google+ Finally Causing a ‘Ripple’?
09:47 am by Aaron

Google+ ran into a brick wall at the outset, being compared to Facebook.

It was competing with Facebook for the same market, or a very similar market. Both firms have impressive pedigrees, which led to numerous stories about how Google+ could be the next Facebook or a “Facebook killer.”

When such expectations are piled on anything, disappointment is usually the only realistic outcome. After a fast start, Google+ has slowed down, and many people have moved on to finding the next “Facebook killer.”

One area where Google+ has Facebook beat, however, is the graphical display of its pages and profile’s metrics. Note: I’m not saying the Google+ metrics are better. I’m saying their graphic display is better.

This is true because of a service called Ripples, which lets you see in a very nifty way  everyone who publicly shared your post.

You can access Ripples from any Google+post by clicking the drop down arrow and choosing “View Ripples.”

Google Ripples screenshot

From there are you treated to an impressive graphical display:

Google Ripples graphic

You can zoom in:

And actually see what was said by the person who shared your post:

Only public shares can be tracked, which saves Google+ from a major breach of privacy but also restricts you from seeing all shares of your content.

Ripples is a cool feature for Google+, but is it actually worthwhile? Personally, I think it’s a really cool toy but not much more. In the end we don’t need a really cool way to see who shared our posts, we just need to know if our posts were shared, +1′d, liked, re-tweeted, whatever. Unless you can afford to employ somebody to sift through the share and see who is saying what about your posts, I don’t see a practical application.

Aaron

11/08/2011

Our First Take on Google+ for Business
02:21 pm by Aaron

Today is an exciting day in the world of social media: Google+ officially launched Pages for Businesses. I went about trying to set up IWS’s Google+ page today and it was a learning experience.

First, I had trouble with our logo. Apparently there are some image restrictions with Google+ pages pictures. While these exist in Facebook as well, there didn’t seem to be a good auto-resize feature yet. I had to crop out “IWS” from our picture, even though I tried to make it smaller and smaller.

Once I got past the profile picture, the rest of the set up went smoothly. I ported over some pictures, info and status updates from Facebook and our infant page was ready to start crawling:

Two features that I liked right off the bat:

  1. I like how a map of IWS’ location is displayed right under the profile picture; this should be a boost for some businesses. I wish there was an option to add more than one location; our poor DC office is left out of the Google Maps fun!
  2. I like the initial circle options for pages. The ability to separate employees, customers, VIPS and other companies you may be following (or any other circle you want to create) has the potential to make the categorization of social information easier than it ever could be on Facebook.

Finally, it took me a while to figure out how to move between my profile and the IWS page. Much like Facebook, you need a profile to create a page.  Unfortunately, at this point, it looks like only a single profile can admin a page. This will have to change if Google+ truly wants to compete with Facebook.

In the meantime, if you are having trouble figuring out how to switch between pages, look no further than right next to your profile picture:

We’re not ready to swap Google+ for Facebook, but we’ll be watching. What are your plans for G+?

Aaron

08/20/2011

Big numbers vs. engagement: Which is better?
12:40 pm by Aaron

Google+ is growing like gangbusters, but SEOptimise says that growth in users doesn’t equal growth in engagement.

Users vs. engagement- — it’s a battle that not only exists in social networks, but in every social media presence. There is a fine line between user base and engagement base.

For example, if my brand creates a Twitter presence, is it better to organically grow a following or try to “buy” followers? If I organically grow a following, I might have a hundred or so engaged followers that are interested in my brand. If I buy a following, I might get 1,000 followers that aren’t as active.

What’s better: the smaller, engaged following or the larger, less engaged following? While it looks good to have thousands of Twitter followers, most will tell you its not about how many followers you have but what type of followers you have.

Confusing? That’s because the line is theoretical. It’s different for each brand, and it is up to the brand manager to figure out where it is.

Of course, the goal always needs to be to get every user engaged.

Aaron

08/05/2011

Android for President?
02:35 pm by Aaron

TechCrunch posted this interesting map today about smartphone adoption in the United States. Kind of looks like a political map to me:

Map of smartphone adoption via states

If they were awarding electoral votes, Android would have a comfortable lead, iOS would be scrambling to re-invent its campaign and BlackBerry would play the role of the feisty, third-party candidate.

Who’s got your vote?

Aaron

08/03/2011

How to Use Google+
08:45 am by Aaron

Google+We’ve been arguing among ourselves about whether, and how, we should be using Google+. Who do you add? Who do you leave off? How do you make time for yet another huge social media platform?

We know we are not alone. Every social network user faces the same problems.

So here’s my take on it.

LinkedIn is the easiest; in fact, it shouldn’t even be in the discussion. You add anyone you want to connect with professionally.  The only information I, or most people, ever share on LinkedIn is professional in nature. Twitter is a bit different; acceptable to add people you’ve never met, as it is people you actually know.

Facebook is the big debate. Personally, I have no idea what to do on Facebook anymore. I am constantly wondering how to manage my friends, acquaintances and colleagues on Facebook. I first joined Facebook in 2004, when it was restricted to college students. I loved the service because I could keep tabs on my entire social circle. Facebook still serves this function today, but it has become incredibly hard to categorize your social circle. I don’t want my co-workers seeing conversations I am having with my family. I don’t need my mom having intimate knowledge of what I did on my Saturday night.

Google+ is an accelerated social network. It started in the mainstream, which means that there are already a wide variety of people to connect with – not just one small niche. Who do we add?

My opinion: Add everyone! Google+’s circles feature makes the sharing of information easy. Google+, unlike other social networks, is built around controlling your flow of information. Circles allow your Google+ stream to display different content from different people, as well as control who sees your status updates. Have a photo from your late night last night that you don’t want family or professional contacts seeing? Make sure you only share it with the circle that contains your friends. Have a link that you want to share with those in your professional network but know your friends won’t care about? There is a circle for that too, and for any group of people you want. It’s the fantastic merger between your public and private personalities online.

Add everyone! That’s what Google+ is built for.

iws

11/17/2009

How well do you know Mr. G?
01:26 pm by iws

Search Engine Optimization, or SEO for short, is the complex process of improving a website’s traffic via online search engines. Blah, blah, blah. By now, most of us are at least somewhat familiar with this rather confusing and intimidating acronym, but I am here to give you my take on it. As an architect of the pages we view, scroll, click, shop, sign-up, comment, peruse, and ultimately rely on for a myriad of daily use, I am here to help sort out the enigma that is SEO. g

Of course I have to say, search engines (plural) in most cases when I’m talking about SEO, but lets face it, for now there’s really only one that matters. Who is this king of the search engines you ask? This internet moderator who answers those tough questions in life, like “Who delivers Chinese at 2 am?” or “How many feet are in a mile??”  Well I could let you take a guess out of……hmmm, I’ll say three, but I’ll just give you a hint instead. His name begins with G and ends with duh.

For most of you who know him, Mr. G is a pretty neat guy. He’s very popular, hip, clean cut, savvy and for the most part, friendly. Friendly of course, only if you speak his language and dress in his style… and guess what, he can be very choosy. Mr. G is at times extremely judgmental, especially if you try to climb his LONG ladder of friends unfairly, by bending his rules. The fact is, his popularity has given him certain rights. There are certain standards he has set in place that allow him to govern how you or your company rank on his coveted list of friends. Oh and by the way, just because you dress Flash-y doesn’t mean you’re automatically buds with G either.

Ahh, the science of SEO… this is where I come in. Though this “science” is complicated, tedious, and dull with outside opinions; I am a firm believer that the basic underlying concepts of SEO will for the most part remain the same. By following a few key rules any site can attract G’s much needed attention. These rules are simple: Have interesting, up-to-date content on a well-designed and developed infrastructure and, bing! your website will skyrocket to the top of Mr. G’s friend list faster than you can say Balloon Boy.

Maybe you love him, with his quick responses on how to spell words like “unconstitutional” or his perfect timing to remind you that, yes, it is actually Sesame Street’s 40 birthday. Maybe you struggle with Mr. G and his fickle, ever changing taste in websites and where he decides to rank them in importance. One thing is for sure: like him or not, the next wave we get from G….. probably won’t be a wave goodbye.